............ Have a nice day............
USER MENU ID IS UNDEFINED IN FINACLE MIS SERVER   Date of Implementation of "VERY GOOD" Bench Mark for MACPs effect from 25.07.2016   Expected DA from Jan 2017 – 3% or 2% ?    One minute talk time for each Rupee in Airtel Payments Bank   AICPIN for October 2016 : Chances for 5% DA from January 2017   Central Government employees retiring from January 2017 to submit online application   Pre-Budget Views of Govt. Employees for inclusion in the Budget for the Year 2017-18: Confederation i.e. Scrap NPS, Minimum Wage Rs. 26,000 & Fitment Formula etc   On Salary Week, Banks Unlikely to Meet Demand for Extra 1 Lakh Cr   82 per cent ATMs dry because government used that money to pay its own employees   National Anthem Before Movie, Rules Supreme Court. Citizens 'Duty-Bound' To Show Respect    undefined

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

Bunching incidence in the 7th Central Pay commission


The bunching incidence in this pay commission is very much on high side. 
For the reason

1. The pay band stages of VI CPC at which the V CPC pay of employees were fixed at every Rs. 10/-. A gap of 10 rupees distinguished the stage of an employee in any given grade pay. Accordingly the net pay had the difference not leading to any grievance.

2. But in this VII CPC all this pay band and grade pay on applying fitment formula are subsumed and the stages are arrived in the name of cell in vertically downward progression.

Thus the stages at every 10 rs in the existing pay when fitted in cell level of 500 to 5000/- in the revised pay naturally gets fitted in same for many.

There are incidence of more than 6 stages getting bunched

The pay commission did not foresee this. It has therefore recommended as ever before .

If at all bunching increment is to given for bunching increment a senior in the bunching sequences if 6 stages will have to be given 3 increment to alleviate bunching .

But again he will b bunched to another in that cell with a different stage in the existing pay.

So this is an on going process and in order to mitigate the genuine grievance the difference in the basic pay of immediate senior to the top most in the bunching sequence and the revised pay of official concerned may please b given as' bunching pay ' as separate entity and not to b absorbed in the pay pay progression till such the effect of bunching vanishes in the event if any upgradation or promotion etc.

Like wise the others in the string of bunching should be given bunching pay in such a way that everyone is unique in the quantum of pay

No comments:

Post a Comment