The 7th CPC submitted its report in November 2015.The Empowered
Committee of Secretaries blocked it for 7 long months. Finally the
cabinet approved the report without any modification, The Gazette
Notification on the pay and allowances of employees was issued on
25-07-2016. The same minimum pay of Rs.18000/- The same multiplication
factor of 2.57. Absolutely no change.
Let us now analyse what would have been
the case, had 50% of Dearness Allowance / Dearness Relief been merged
with pay / pension with effect from 01-11-2011. DA merger had taken
place before implementation of 5th and 6th CPC Recommendations. Though
we had demanded it this time also, it was not agreed to. Whether enough
organizational pressure was there to get the demand accepted is now an
academic issue for discussion only. The DA / DR was 51% in January 2011.
The percentage rates of DA/DR were 58, 65, 72, 80, 90, 100 107, 113,
119 and 125 during subsequent six monthly periods up to January 2016.
Now we shall workout the financial implication of the 50% DA/DR merger
notionally. A person with a basic pay / pension of Rs. 10,000/- would
have got Rs. 1,06,500/- as difference in DA/DR for the period 01-01-2011
to 31-12-2015. That is the notional loss. It is easy to workout. For
every 1,000 rupee as pay / pension, the benefit would have been Rs.
10650/- We cannot even dream of such an amount as pay revision
“bonanza”.
The pay + DA of the lowest paid employee
who was drawing Rs. 7,000/- (5,200 +1,800). On 01-01-2016 would have
been Rs. 1,8375/- In that case, no Pay Commission would have dared to
recommend Rs. 18000/- as minimum pay as it would have been less than the
actual pay + DA drawn by the employee. Even if we accept the 14.29%
increase recommended by the 7th CPC, the minimum pay would have been Rs.
21,000/- and so the multiplication factor would have increased to 3
instead of 2.57. Employees and pensioners would have been benefitted
significantly.
We were after the euphoria of a Pay
Commission. We thought the CPC and the Government will deliver us good.
It was a folly on our part in not clinching the demand of merger of 50%
DA with effect from 01-01-2011. We shall blame ourselves for that. This
is a lesson for us to be cautious in future.
Source: http://cgpakerala.blogspot.in/
No comments:
Post a Comment